Eco tyres versus normal tyres

2016 Seat Mii FR Line (Matt Kimberley/PA)

2016 Seat Mii FR Line (Matt Kimberley/PA) - Credit: Archant

They’re standard on more and more new cars these days, but have you ever wondered what difference low-rolling-resistance tyres make? Wonder no more, writes Matt Kimberley

Bridgestone Ecopia low-rolling-resistance tyre (Matt Kimberley/PA)

Bridgestone Ecopia low-rolling-resistance tyre (Matt Kimberley/PA) - Credit: Archant

You don’t often get the chance to drive two near-identical cars back-to-back, where the only noteworthy difference is low-friction tyres.

The car in question is the Seat Mii. The two best Miis right now are the FR Line, a sporty little number with dark grey body graphics and a dinky roof spoiler, and the plum-trimmed Mii by Mango, which for a short time you can get in this Limited Edition guise. Both have the 74bhp 1.0-litre engine, and both of our test cars have covered around 800 miles from new, both allegedly weigh the same (despite having different door counts) and both have the removable Garmin-based infotainment system, complete with comprehensive trip computer readouts (including fuel economy).

But while the sporty FR Line runs on 16-inch wheels and Bridgestone Turanza T001 tyres, the Mango uses funky 15-inch purple rims wearing low-rolling-resistance Bridgestone Ecopia rubber. Both tyres plant a 185mm-wide footprint on the road. In theory, the difference in the way they drive should be minimal. But all is not as it seems, as I quickly realise after sending the FR Line back home and settling into a few miles in the Mango.

The FR Line, with its red-trimmed black seats and matching dashboard, is a little firmer over bumps. Bigger wheels plus the same suspension equals a smidgeon of added harshness.

On the other hand the little red charger grips like a mountain goat, its lower-profile (and stiffer-sidewalled) Turanzas giving such a solid hold on the road that to un-stick it you’d have to be unhinged. Even in the wet you can throw it around like a rag doll. On its eco-boots the Mango gives up the ghost sooner, although still not until you’re pushing it hard. Worth mentioning but, fair enough, it’s rarely relevant since both grip well.

The biggest difference is fuel economy - and the split is massive. Driving the same route in both, in near-identical weather and traffic conditions, sees just under 55mpg in the FR Line but a few tenths over 65mpg in the Mango. That’s close to a 20 per cent boost. Remember, the only relevant difference is the wheel and tyre combination. Tyre pressures were correct on all eight corners.

Most Read

It’s technically possible that other factors are involved, if you like clutching at straws. Maybe the FR Line’s engine isn’t running quite as sweetly as the Mango’s. Maybe a few tolerances are at their limit and it needs more miles to loosen up fully. Maybe the Mii’s diddy size and weight accentuates the eye-opening difference the tyres make. But, from this real-world evidence, perhaps buying efficiency-minded tyres might do more for your wallet than you’d have thought.

Become a Supporter

This newspaper has been a central part of community life for many years. Our industry faces testing times, which is why we're asking for your support. Every contribution will help us continue to produce local journalism that makes a measurable difference to our community.

Become a Supporter