18-year-old jailed for breaching community penalty
SQUANDERING two chances to meet the demands of a community penalty has cost a teenager his liberty. He has been jailed for 12 months for breaching the order. Warren Gray s first chance came when he was given a suspended sentence last March for an attempte
SQUANDERING two chances to meet the demands of a community penalty has cost a teenager his liberty.
He has been jailed for 12 months for breaching the order.
Warren Gray's first chance came when he was given a suspended sentence last March for an attempted burglary of a house in Stevenage. The order also meant he had to be supervised and do unpaid work.
But four months later he was hauled back to Luton Crown Court because he was not doing the unpaid work. There a judge removed the requirement to do the work but extended the supervision period.
You may also want to watch:
But on Thursday he was back at court again, having failed to attend his supervision sessions on two occasions, said prosecutor Anne Donelon.
Recorder Alistair Sharp told him: "You were given not only one but two chances, and your order was made less onerous. The probation service take seriously any breaches of such orders and it is right that they do so. I have no alternative but to implement the sentence."
- 1 7 haunted locations that will give you a Halloween fright
- 2 Memories of a famous FA Cup run for Stevenage after first round draw made
- 3 Road closures following crash in Letchworth
- 4 As Michael Keaton's Batman returns, Knebworth House features in first teaser for The Flash movie
- 5 Man taken to hospital after crash involving mobility scooter and motorhome
- 6 Man dies after Stevenage e-scooter crash
- 7 Case for the defence needed quickly after bad defeat for Stevenage
- 8 5 of the best pumpkin picking locations in Hertfordshire
- 9 Letchworth paedophile jailed for sexual activity with a child
- 10 Opening of long-awaited Stevenage supermarket
Gray, 18, of Gonville Crescent, Stevenage, pleaded guilty to breaching the order.
Alasdair Smith, defending, said: "Sending him to prison would be a retrograde step. Belatedly he has been in regular contact with his supervising officer, and there is no suggestion that he has committed any further offences, which shows that that part of the order is working.