The anti-social act of walking

SIR - I am writing to express my irritation at being stopped in the woodland adjacent to the dell by Windmill Lane, Hitchin on Sunday, January 6 on the grounds of being suspected of anti-social behaviour. While walking in the woodland - owned by North H

SIR - I am writing to express my irritation at being stopped in the woodland adjacent to the dell by Windmill Lane, Hitchin on Sunday, January 6 on the grounds of being suspected of 'anti-social' behaviour.

While walking in the woodland - owned by North Herts District Council (NHDC), and public not private land - I was approached and stopped by two men, one a plain clothes police officer, and the other an NHDC employee. When I asked the reason for being stopped, I was told that it was because of the recent high level of anti-social behaviour taking place on and around the site. What the anti-social behaviour consisted of, I wasn't told.

I was then asked where I had come from, my purpose for walking in the woods and where I was going, following which I had to give my details for the purpose of a form (of which I was given a copy). My description was noted and recorded as well following which I had to sign an affadavit saying I had been well treated, and was allowed to go.

I am concerned for several reasons following this incident. I often walk in the woods and now wonder whether this means I will be stopped again. If I am stopped again in the same place, will this be taken as proof of guilt, despite the fact that I am merely walking and not committing, or planning to commit, any kind of crime. Why was I stopped in the first place? A case of being in the wrong place at the wrong time? My definition of anti-social behaviour would be either drinking, vandalism, drug abuse or sexual activity in a public place. I was obviously doing none of these.


You may also want to watch:


I also resent the fact that I was stopped on a quiet Sunday afternoon, yet youths are often visible either on the benches at the top of the dell or in the woods themselves on a regular basis and appear to be unchallenged by any kind of authority. Vandalism is rife in the area but seems to continue unchecked. I fully expect the NHDC and police response to be to close the woods to public access, but this would be a rash solution - with proper policing that utilises and doesn't isolate the community, the problem could be sorted, or at least tackled efficiently. Stopping me or other local citizens who are merely enjoying a walk on public ground is both a waste of police time and mine.

Chris Gilson

Most Read

Address Supplied

Become a Supporter

This newspaper has been a central part of community life for many years. Our industry faces testing times, which is why we're asking for your support. Every contribution will help us continue to produce local journalism that makes a measurable difference to our community.

Become a Supporter