Council's costly mistake
NORTH Herts District Council (NHDC) has made a blunder which will ultimately cost taxpayers almost �400 to rectify. NHDC sent out council tax bills containing an error to almost 750 pensioners across North Herts. The bills did not display the entitlement
NORTH Herts District Council (NHDC) has made a blunder which will ultimately cost taxpayers almost �400 to rectify.
NHDC sent out council tax bills containing an error to almost 750 pensioners across North Herts.
The bills did not display the entitlement to council tax benefit for those in receipt of a specific element of Pension Credit.
This mistake will have undoubtedly worried some of the most vulnerable people in the district, and caused unnecessary confusion.
But it has also proved a costly mistake, with council taxpayers picking up the bill.
The fact the error was made in the first place is irksome, but what compounds the matter is the flagrant disregard the council appears to have for our money.
Most Read
- 1 Weston fraudster given jail time after scamming council out of £700,000
- 2 Licence review for Hitchin's Chicken George after neighbour complaint
- 3 'He lives on in the hearts of those who knew him' - hundreds pay respects to Kajetan at moving mass
- 4 Programme of one-off summer workshops at The Settlement
- 5 Decision on controversial Lord Lister application deferred
- 6 Bid to find living kidney transplant donor for Hitchin girl
- 7 Stevenage school in 'area of huge deprivation' wins national award
- 8 Permanent parking loss if outdoor seating plans approved
- 9 Hitchin Lavender named the most Instagrammed floral location in UK
- 10 Herts police officers shared rape 'jokes' and bestiality porn on WhatsApp
By sending an apologetic letter to affected residents separately to the revised bill, the cost of rectifying the situation has doubled.
This unnecessary cost has been incurred by a council which this year said an increase in council tax was necessary to help make up a budgetary shortfall of more than �1m in the coming financial year, rising to nearly �2m the following year.
When considering the cost of the blunder, it is also worth remembering that taxpayers have paid NHDC workers to repeat a job which was not done properly the first time around.
All in all it doesn't seem to represent value for money now, does it?
