Car park puzzle
Having visited the Stevenage town regeneration exhibition this week we were amazed to find out the council s plans for the swimming pool. A new car park has only just been built at a substantial cost. However the plans show that the council are already pr
Having visited the Stevenage town regeneration exhibition this week we were amazed to find out the council's plans for the swimming pool.
A new car park has only just been built at a substantial cost. However the plans show that the council are already proposing to get rid of this and build on it to expand the facilities at the swimming pool. Once again the adjacent parking will be inadequate!
We were informed by someone from the council that anyone using the swimming pool complex will then have to park in the proposed multi-storey car park on the other side of a busy dual carriageway (St Georges Way).
Mothers with three or four young children, elderly people, and other children, will then all have to cross the busy dual carriageway by pedestrian crossing. Whose idea was this, surely a leisure centre should have adjacent parking which is much safer for everyone? Otherwise an accident will be just waiting to happen.
You may also want to watch:
NAME AND ADDRESS SUPPLIED
* Thank you for publishing my views on the Southgate area on page nine of your March 29 issue and also my letter on page 19. (Future of a town centre).
- 1 Closure order for Hitchin bungalow following anti-social behaviour
- 2 Why grass in Stevenage and North Herts public areas isn't cut
- 3 Demolition work begins on former Matalan site to make way for flats
- 4 Surprise care home inspection finds residents at risk
- 5 'Music legends' Aswad impress at LGC Live event in town centre
- 6 New mental health unit earmarked for Stevenage
- 7 Some bus services set to change to 'build on great network'
- 8 Two people taken to hospital with serious injuries after Clothall Road crash
- 9 A family affair and club history make it a special day for Letchworth
- 10 Officers investigating vehicle interferences urge victims to come forward
However I draw attention to the statement by Nick Parry which states that the majority of residents of The Towers were in favour of the development in its proposed form after consultation, which gives a false impression that there were at least a fair number living there who were in favour of demolition.
This is absolutely untrue and can be seen from the SBC pamphlet The Future of the Towers which shows that whereas tenants were 16 in favour and 12 against demolition, there were, in the case of leaseholders, only two in favour and seven against. We have therefore, by a majority of one, a disagreement for demolition.
By no means, therefore, is the reported statement by Mr Parry true that an unspecified 'majority' were in favour of demolition.
ERIC RATCLIFFE, The Towers, Stevenage